Re: [lojban] Parsers ("ge ... gi ..." question)

[Chris Capel <pdf23ds@gmail.com>]

2010/9/17 Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>:
> There are no other parsers I'm aware of.  LogGloss is just a wrapper
> on camxes as far as I know, but it may be using the PEG directly; I
> don't know, I've never looked at or used it.  Someone should ask
> Chris to fix his server, or come find me and we can talk about
> hosting.

It uses the PEG directly, and generates the parser code using the same
software, so it should be pretty much the same as camxes. I have
incorporated a number of minor changes into the PEG (all have been run
by xorxes publicly on lojban-list, IIRC). It currently has a console
UI as well as the heavyweight web-based one.

I haven't touched it in over a year, and I've sort of moved away from
C#, so it might take me a while to get back into it. It never really
had many users, so I wouldn't be surprised if the current package
didn't work for minor reasons.

Chris Capel
-- 
"What is it like to be a bat? What is it like to bat a bee? What is it
like to be a bee being batted? What is it like to be a batted bee?"
-- The Mind's I (Hofstadter, Dennet)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.