Which is itself xagji since mla is the rafsi for mlana, not mlatu and hence, is completely unrelated to cats
On Sep 23, 2010 2:44 PM, "Adam D. Lopresto" <adam@pubcrawler.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Jonathan Jones wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Stela Selckiku <selckiku@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> Do you know ".u'ivla"? It means a word that's funny! :D
>>
>> Oh. I thought you were doing {fu'ivla} without the "f" for some odd reason
>> (You doing it for odd reason.). Also, I don't think you can lujvo-ize
>> {.u'i}.... {xamvla}?
>
> {.u'ivla} is itself a fu'ivla, not a lujvo (as you say, *-u'i- isn't a rafsi).
> So that makes {.u'ivla} an .u'ivla.
>
> Related in origin is {.u'imla}, also an .u'ivla, a fu'ivla, and a translation
> of "LOLcat".
> --
> Adam Lopresto
> http://cec.wustl.edu/~adam/
>
> He spoke with the wisdom that can only come from experience, like
> a guy who went blind because he looked at a solar eclipse without
> one of those boxes with a pinhole in it and now goes around the
> country speaking at high schools about the dangers of looking at
> a solar eclipse without one of those boxes with a pinhole in it.
> (Joseph Romm, Washington)
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
>