Dnia poniedziałek, 27 września 2010 o 19:50:15 Alan Post napisał(a):
> You can compose the meaning by looking at the definition of me and
> moi:
>
> me:
>
> x1 is a mass formed from the set x2 of n members,
> one or more of which is/are x3
I think you quoted a definition of {mei}, not {me} :)
me:
convert sumti to selbri/tanru element; x1 is specific to [sumti] in aspect x2.
> Other intrepretation is most certainly welcome! It doesn't seem accidental,
> as a special rule was made for it.
It would appear so, although CLL seems to imply that ME..MEhU is supposed to me mainly a parenthesis around a complex number, that is later passed to MOI.
--
Ecce Jezuch
"Jon: I think setting goals is very important.
Garfield: Good idea. Without a goal, how would you know when you failed?"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.