[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Semantic Representation of Lojban
[I've moved this to it's own thread for higher visibility of the
topic.]
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:38:23PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > Well, to a certain extent you're right, but if you choose the
> > right kind of semantic representation, you can do things like
> > proving that two different strings of Lojban have the same
> > meaning. Correct me if I'm wrong, but at the moment no machine
> > grammar of Lojban represents the fact that “mi viska do” is
> > equivalent to “do se viska mi”.
>
> Right, very true. People have started playing with that.
>
I've started playing with it, certainly. Enough to where I'm
considering flying out to Penguicon to brainstorm and talk about
it with other Lojbanists.
If others of you are working on it and are able and interested in
meeting about it, will you speak up?
-Alan
--
.i ko djuno fi le do sevzi
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.