Re: [lojban] non-ka properties

[John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

Sorry; I should have clarified "in text", there are , of course, properties 
never referred to or not in this corpus, etc. but, if they are referred to at 
all, they are referred to using ka-expressions (or indirectly). On the issue of 
whether one ka expression can refer to several (though presumably even then not 
uncountably many) different properties, I gave to suppose that is as true as the 
claim that some predicates are ambiguous, which seems certainly true -- maybe 
even in a given context.  





----- Original Message ----
From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, June 18, 2011 2:17:43 PM
Subject: Re: [lojban] non-ka properties

On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:56 PM, John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:
>   A case
> could be made, I think, that all and only properties are referred to by
> ka-expressions.

"Only", perhaps. "All", I doubt. The number of ka-expressions is
countable, while the number of properties is not. Perhaps you are
allowing the same ka-expression to be used to refer to more than one
property.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.