Re: [lojban] Re: lojban and PR

[Muhammad Nael <muhammad.nael@gmail.com>]

I'm being reasonably optimistic thinking it'd take less than 5 years to make a Lojban successor... I'll have a week off in the next few days, so I won't debate the new-vocab issue now...

I never said that current users should switch, only that they should work on a better platform for possible near-future adherents.

I study linguistics as a hobby, but I can't agree or disagree with the specific issue you cited. In any case, Lojban-2, Loccan-3, Loghnat,... etc should be built in a pyramid model taking into account all the points ye have raised countless times in which I've no doubt; ie. there should be simpler 'layers' of the same language that wouldn't need the learner to know the language perfectly before he can use it minimally!

I may not have made my point very clear; I apologize but I'm very busy today.

Regards,

MN

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/jZGKrMwjkSoJ.
 
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.