Re: [lojban] gender

["John E. Clifford" <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

But fosters the notion that these various concepts are somehow related beyond the accidents of English vocabulary.

Sent from my iPad

On Nov 7, 2011, at 12:48 PM, vitci'i <celestialcognition@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 11/07/2011 12:45 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:33 PM, vitci'i <celestialcognition@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Actually, no. The real reason is because I want to make it explicit that
>>> using the gender gismu without specifying what kind of gender is
>>> omitting critical information.
>> 
>> Giving it a gismu place is highly unlikely to encourage people to
>> specify it - the "by criterion/standard x3" and the like places see
>> fairly little use.
>> 
>> - mi'e .kreig.daniyl.
> 
> Nevertheless, it makes the omission explicit.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.