Re: [lojban] semantic parser - tersmu-0.1rc1

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
>
>  I have {ny da my da} equivalent
> to {ny da da} - because I couldn't make any sense of the CLL's
> prescriptions for quantifiers on already bound {da}.
>
> Any advice on that?

("ny da my da" is four sumti.)

It seems to me the only sensible approach is to take the second "da"
as a new variable, and any following instance of "da" within the
second quantifier's scope to be an instance of the new variable, and
later instances within the first quantifier's scope to be instances of
the first variable. Of course any speaker that makes use of that is
just being mean.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.