Re: [lojban] semantic parser - tersmu-0.1rc1

["John E. Clifford" <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

Sent from my iPad

On Nov 26, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:

> * Saturday, 2011-11-26 at 17:29 -0600 - John E. Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>> On Nov 26, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> * Saturday, 2011-11-26 at 09:32 -0800 - John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>:
>>> 
>>>> This latter is true also of non-restrictive relative clauses, but they
>>>> are simply separate sentences: {lo proda noi brode cu brodi} is {lo
>>>> broda cu brodi .ije lo broda cu brode}.
>>> 
>>> But what about {ro da noi brode cu brodi}? And {na ku ro da noi brode cu
>>> brodi}?
>>> 
>> Well, I don't understand this really, but it doesn't seem to change
>> the rule,I.e. = { ro da brodi .I roda brode}.  {poi} just makes
>> a restricted quantifier, "all brode".
> 
> And also {na ku ro da noi brode cu brodi} -> {na ku ro da brodi .i je ro
> da brode}, the noi-clause breaking out of the scope of the negation?

I think so, but, as I said, I find {noi} attached to a variable very strange.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.