* Saturday, 2011-11-26 at 17:29 -0600 - John E. Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>:
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Nov 26, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
>
> > * Saturday, 2011-11-26 at 09:32 -0800 - John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>:
> >
> >> This latter is true also of non-restrictive relative clauses, but they
> >> are simply separate sentences: {lo proda noi brode cu brodi} is {lo
> >> broda cu brodi .ije lo broda cu brode}.
> >
> > But what about {ro da noi brode cu brodi}? And {na ku ro da noi brode cu
> > brodi}?
> >
> Well, I don't understand this really, but it doesn't seem to change
> the rule,I.e. = { ro da brodi .I roda brode}. {poi} just makes
> a restricted quantifier, "all brode".
And also {na ku ro da noi brode cu brodi} -> {na ku ro da brodi .i je ro
da brode}, the noi-clause breaking out of the scope of the negation?
Attachment:
pgpSzvxchXvv4.pgp
Description: PGP signature