* Saturday, 2011-11-26 at 19:12 -0300 - Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
> > Yes, I know you prefer to use constant kinds in these situations, but
> > would you *allow* temporally varying interpretations of {lo bradi} in
> > {ro roi mi'o jinga fi lo bradi}?
> ("ro roi ku")
(oops again)
> > And if I say 'please'?
>
> I allow it in the same sense I allow temporally varying
> interpretations of "mi" in "ro roi ku do viska mi". "mi" refers to one
> thing, but it is also true that each time you see me you see something
> different.
Well, I had to try.
Martin
Attachment:
pgpDjb0QgNpSi.pgp
Description: PGP signature