* Saturday, 2011-11-26 at 19:12 -0300 - Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I know you prefer to use constant kinds in these situations, but
> > would you *allow* temporally varying interpretations of {lo bradi} in
> > {ro roi mi'o jinga fi lo bradi}?
>
> ("ro roi ku")
>
> > And if I say 'please'?
>
> I allow it in the same sense I allow temporally varying
> interpretations of "mi" in "ro roi ku do viska mi". "mi" refers to one
> thing, but it is also true that each time you see me you see something
> different.
And do you similarly really want {ko'a .e ko'e lo broda cu brode} to not
be equivalent to {ge ko'a lo broda cu brode gi ko'e lo broda cu brode},
in that the value of {lo broda} can be different in the two occurances
in the latter but must be constant in the former?
That complicates things significantly, you know.
Martin
Attachment:
pgpyUgp5weu0d.pgp
Description: PGP signature