Re: [lojban] No title, since the subject will have changed by the time it gets there

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
>
> (Except that it only works if the unfilled second place of {du} is
> interpreted correctly... it would be nice to have a clearer way of
> getting at the always-true unary predicate. Do we have one?)

I suggest "suzdu'o", defined as:

ko'a suzdu'o == su'o da zo'u ko'a du da

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.