Re: [lojban] footnotes, etc?

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

2012/3/12 Felipe Gonçalves Assis <felipeg.assis@gmail.com>:
> doi xorxes,
>
> Can't you define an equivalence relation among valid written texts,
> another one among valid speech streams, and then pair-up the
> equivalence classes?
>
> Wouldn't that still be an isomorphism?
>
> I understand that the concept is more subtle, but the name is still valid.

OK, as long as it's understood that way, fine. But then what does that
have to do with the footnotes issue? I'm just saying it is not the
case that to each speech stream corresponds one spelling and to each
spelling corresponds one speech stream.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.