Re: Word changing and word creation (was Re: [lojban] bugs in jbovlaste)

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:38:10PM -0700, gleki wrote:
> >>FWIW, as the apparent overlord these days, I disagree,
> >>*strongly*, with both of those points.  gismu should not be
> >>changed unless it can be shown that particular places have been
> >>very rarely used correctly, and I think making a bunch more
> >>gismu is a great idea. 
> 
> And I have to add that Next Lojban must not conflict with the
> existing one so that in year 2112 texts written in 2012 will still
> be apprehensible.

You mean "comprehensible".

Generally speaing, yes, although I expect I *will* be changing some
things, but only with a clear, and fairly long, deprecation process,
and probably only things that have seen little or no actual use.

-Robin

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
.i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i danfu lu na go'i li'u .e
lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u .e lu go'i na'i li'u .e
lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo mamta be do cu sofybakni li'u

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.