On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:31 AM, gleki
<gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Regarding the second, I was more referring to current policy than any future practices. I have >>little opinion on the matter myself, save that I would prefer as little overlap as possible >>between new and existing gismu. There are places where we are sorely lacking, I'm sure, but I >>don't think we need to create new gismu that are really just synonyms of existing ones.
Don't have to say anything against.
Just a note that there are already numerous synonyms in the gismu list.
I could count only 340 gismu absolutely needed (+cultural gismu if we don't ignore them).