Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

No. No more argument. If you do not provide /evidence/, you will /never/ convince me.

I don't believe you. I have heard you repeat your argument time and again. In fact, all you've done /at all/ in this thread is repeat your argument, over and over again.

You have not once provided one reason for why you are even /talking/ about this, as Lindar asked you to do more than once, nor have you provided even the merest shred of evidence.

I don't need to hear your argument. I don't need to hear other arguments about similar things made by other people. This is not philosophy: we require proof.

On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com> wrote:

Considering that nobody has metrics for Lojban or for the general case
of paradigms in totally any language, you won't have more than
qualitative argument based on mathematical properties of complexity
measures and generic minorations/majorations of allowed values.

Thus, the genetic argument is roughly the one given here --->
http://bluemoon.lescigales.org/Kholok/CollectiveDesambiguation.html

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.