Am 14.09.2012 23:36, schrieb Jorge Llambías:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:11 PM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:A cmavo can't have three VVV in a row, so the cmavo clusters always decompose unambiguously.I completely agree with selpa'i, but that bit can be confusing. "iai", "iau", "iei", "ioi", "uai", "uau", "uei", "uoi" should all be valid cmavo. I'm not sure if you are counting the first letter in those as a V.
I think this is untrodden territory which is open to future changes, possibly. My considerations so far included mostly words that already are part of the grammar. I agree that those words could in theory constitute valid cmavo. The first letter in all of them is a C in my opinion. I'm not sure what the consequences would be of allowing these cmavo into the language, if any. I wouldn't be opposed to it though, I think. Maybe when we run out of cmavo space, we can come back and scoop up these additional CVV.
mu'o mi'e la selpa'i -- pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo doị mèlbi mlenì'u .i do càtlu ki'u ma fe la xàmpre ŭu .i do tìnsa càrmi gi'e sìrji se tàrmi .i taị bo pu cìtka lo gràna ku -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.