Re: [lojban] "turn on"

[djandus <jandew@gmail.com>]

Ah, thank you! I did not know of {sazri}. {zilsazri} makes a lot more sense for an operatorless "turn on".

I can imagine {zilsazri} with definition: x1 [apparatus/machine] is "on"/working, fullfilling its goal/use/function x2.

mu'o mi'e djos

On Sunday, September 16, 2012 12:16:25 AM UTC-5, gejyspa wrote:

  If this is still open for discussion, I'd prefer using sazri as the base gismu, because "pilno" is too broad. You can pilno things i.e. lo valsi that don't "turn on", whereas sazri has to be (outside metaphorical use) a cabra or minji, basically.

      --gejsypa

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/3NdH-5pDyEIJ.
 
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.