[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: A new Lojbanic wiki (LMW). On the threshold of the 25th anniversary of Lojban



Let me see if I understand:

1) you create a new platform and obsolete the work I've done.
2) you make it my problem that my data isn't available.

Did I miss anything?

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 06:02:03AM -0800, la gleki wrote:
>    Lojbananas, I've switched off my creative mind recently so my future work
>    on LMW will be exclusively described as "add and add and add... and
>    stupidly add more content".
>    So my questions.
>    1. If you want ALL the pages from the old wiki migrated please contact
>    camgusmis or other people that have access to TikiWiki yourself to get a
>    dump of all pages. If you can show that your method of importing it back
>    to your own distribution of mediawiki works then of course together with
>    me we'll import all the pages to LMW.
>    1a. If you (tsani + me + probably some other jbopre) don't like pages for
>    geeks being present there why not move them into a separate namespace or
>    just prefix them with "Pages for developers/" or similar string?
>    2. What plugins do you currently need?
>    SemanticMW.... got it.
>    anything else?
> 
>    On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 11:47:05 PM UTC+4, .alyn.post. wrote:
> 
>      I like the suggestion of a {{cleanup}} template.  I've been working
>      on general workflow templates over at OpenCog:
> 
>        [1]http://wiki.opencog.org/w/Curation
> 
>      And they are similar to this idea.  You can mark a page as a
>      {{stub}}, mark it as work in progress ({{WIP}})* write it until
>      it's a {{proposal}}, and then {{withdraw}} it if it's a bad idea
>      or tag it with a {{version}} if it becomes a feature.  Later work
>      may cause it to be {{obsolete}} and if you don't keep it in sync
>      it might get {{out of date}}.
> 
>      These templates also take care to register the pages in the
>      appropriate namespaces, so a curator can see which pages are in
>      which categories.  I like workflow processes like this because any
>      effort has a 'long tail' of incomplete, partial, bad, and promising
>      ideas that don't quite fit into the existing structure of the wiki.
> 
>      mi'e .alyn.
> 
>      * = adding that is on my list, it doesn't exist yet.
> 
>      On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:29:43AM -0800, vruxir wrote:
>      >    I'm of the opinion that it would benefit a future Wiki if it has
>      imported
>      >    ALL the contents from the TWiki. If that can be done automatically,
>      then
>      >    hopefully there's also a way to automatically place a "Cleanup" box
>      at the
>      >    top of each imported article, saying something to the effect of:
>      >    "This article was imported from the old [2]lojban.org Tiki Wiki and
>      may not
>      >    meet the content and style guidelines of this Wiki. Please see our
>      >    _content and style guidelines_ and clean up this article. If you
>      feel that
>      >    the article is named inappropriately, the article can be moved to a
>      new
>      >    name. Do not remove this tag until the article is up to standards."
>      >    Then you'll want to have some content and style guidelines,
>      probably
>      >    inspired by Wikipedia or other successful Wikis.
>      >    (When you move an article to a new name, the old name becomes a
>      redirect;
>      >    if you replace the old name with a new article, you can insert tags
>      at the
>      >    top of the article with suggestions to visit the moved article.
>      See, for
>      >    example, the top of the article
>      [1][3]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation
>      >    )
>      >    If there is a debate about what a word really MEANS, then I would
>      think
>      >    the article about that word needs to report the differing
>      viewpoints
>      >    (including CLL's viewpoint) and what level of support the
>      viewpoints
>      >    have. Then the actual continuing debate over the meaning of the
>      word could
>      >    go in the Discussion tab, OR if it's possible to create another tab
>      with a
>      >    more appropriate name (e.g. "Grammar Debate"), do that and leave
>      the
>      >    Discussion tab for talking about the quality of the article itself.
>      >    By importing all the TWiki content to the new Wiki (and marking
>      them all
>      >    for "cleanup"), you can safely redirect people from the TWiki to
>      the new
>      >    Wiki if/when it has been demonstrated that the new Wiki is
>      superior, and
>      >    you don't have to worry about losing important discussions.
>      >    mu'o mi'e vruxir
>      >    On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 12:16:51 PM UTC-5, .alyn.post. wrote:
>      >
>      >      On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 04:21:14AM -0800, la gleki wrote:
>      >      >        * We're making a fresh start, so why not keep it clean?
>      >
>      >      To be contrary a moment,
>      >
>      >      I've put a lot of work in writing and organizing TWiki pages.
>       I'm
>      >      happy to have them migrated to mediawiki, but I'm more-or-less
>      being
>      >      told that the work I've done on TWiki isn't valuable ("fresh
>      start").
>      >      Any work I would do on the new wiki would need to access/refer
>      to/
>      >      modify the pages I have worked on than are in TWiki.
>      >
>      >      I'd love to have them imported to Mediawiki, but as things stand
>      I feel
>      >      like work I've put into the wiki is more-or-less being deleted
>      (you can
>      >      call it archiving if you want) and I'm wondering what the heck I
>      would
>      >      be expected to do with the new wiki when all the content I want
>      to work
>      >      on is in the old wiki.
>      >
>      >      mi'e .alyn.
>      >      --
>      >      .i ma'a lo bradi cu penmi gi'e du
>      >
>      >    --
>      >    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>      Groups
>      >    "lojban" group.
>      >    To view this discussion on the web visit
>      >    [2][4]https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/01evXYCxTw8J.
>      >    To post to this group, send email to [5]loj...@googlegroups.com.
>      >    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>      >    [6]lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
>      >    For more options, visit this group at
>      >    [7]http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
>      >
>      > References
>      >
>      >    Visible links
>      >    1. [8]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation
>      >    2. [9]https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/01evXYCxTw8J
> 
>      --
>      .i ma'a lo bradi cu penmi gi'e du
> 
>    --
>    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>    "lojban" group.
>    To view this discussion on the web visit
>    [10]https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/WCfLQSvTsUQJ.
>    To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
>    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>    lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>    For more options, visit this group at
>    http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
> 
> References
> 
>    Visible links
>    1. http://wiki.opencog.org/w/Curation
>    2. http://lojban.org/
>    3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation
>    4. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/01evXYCxTw8J
>    5. javascript:
>    6. javascript:
>    7. http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en
>    8. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation
>    9. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/01evXYCxTw8J
>   10. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/WCfLQSvTsUQJ

-- 
.i ma'a lo bradi cu penmi gi'e du

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.