On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:55:41AM -0700, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com>wrote: > I will tell you that this has come up before, was discussed, and it was > determined that "(FA) <sumti> FA <sumti>" is equivalent to "(FA) <sumti> > ju'e <sumti>", and that I'm fairly certain the discussion is in the Google > Group archives- although it is possible that the discussion predates the > move to GG, I doubt it does. It's also more likely to be in the main group > than the beginners. > The discussion I can remember was three month ago and is quite short. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/c7Wrov6u8vIJ. There was not really a decision reached there as far as I can see. v4hn
Attachment:
pgpuB0hsDLvEG.pgp
Description: PGP signature