On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote:
.i.e'u cuxna lo pamei lo ckafi .e lo tcatiYou shouldn't have logical "and" there; I concede that the irrealis attitudinal scope can be argued to fix it,How? Neither (what I believe is the correct expansion):.e'u ge cuxna lo pamei lo ckafi gi cuxna lo pamei lo tcatinor:ge .e'u cuxna lo pamei lo ckafi gi .e'u cuxna lo pamei lo tcati(which I don't think is the correct expansion) are anything like what is wanted.mu'o mi'e xorxesWith great handwaving you could argue that there just isn't an expansion. I personally would likely read it as the first expansion, which is of course not what is desired. I agree that it is a bad idea.
mi'e la latro'a mu'o--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.