[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] cmevla as a class of brivla





On Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:49:46 AM UTC+4, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 20:49:16 Betsemes wrote:
> And what make nicknames and real names different? Nothing. The only
> difference is that a nickname is not the person's legal name. If
> Lojban would become mainstream, people very well may attempt to name a
> child with a brivla.

There are countries with laws on the linguistic forms of allowed names.
Iceland requires that names be declinable in Icelandic. Turkey prohibits some
non-Turkic letters in names, which annoys Kurds, who use these letters in both
names and ordinary words in their language. Why shouldn't Lojbangug have such
a law?

I favor keeping cmevla and brivla syntactically distinct. We've already
eliminated the adjective and the adverb.

adjectives are NOI-clauses.
Adverbs are sei-clauses or fi'o-clauses.
Alternatively, both of them are tanru.


Why eliminate the noun as well?

Pierre
--
La sal en el mar es más que en la sangre.
Le sel dans la mer est plus que dans le sang.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.