John E Clifford wrote:
It s probably worth noting in these otherwise dubious expansions that
the assigned name is deracinated, that is, it does NOT include, even
implicitly, any {zo'e}s. {la broda be zo'e} is another name altogether,
and no more related to the first than {la brode} is.
There appear to be two choices. One is that {la} functions like {le}
etc. making a special kind of description out of a brivla or bridi tail
or what have you.
Which is exactly what the formal grammar says that it does. lojbab -- Bob LeChevalier lojbab@lojban.org www.lojban.org President and Founder, The Logical Language Group, Inc. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.