[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Specifying sumti types: another revision of gimste is complete




On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:

(2) I don't think cpedu2 should be limited to properties, especially when the property holder comes later in the structure. 

I disagree with this one, I think anything other than ka in cpedu2 is raising. You're asking them to do something, so if the objective you're talking about is some other event which does not have the cpedu3 in it directly, then use {tu'a}, {lo ka ce'u gasnu ...}, or something similar.

I was thinking of objects rather than events. This really should be discussed within the wider frame of all the possession and transfer predicates, so I will leave my comments for later.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.