On Sunday, September 28, 2014 6:03:21 AM UTC-4, selpa'i wrote:la .xorxes. cu cusku di'e
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 7:43 PM, And Rosta <and....@gmail.com
> <mailto:and....@gmail.com>> wrote:
> I had misremembered {voi}. I mean rather that {le broda} is {lo co'e
> voi'i ke'a broda}, where {voi'i} is nonveridical {noi} (I haven't
> found an existing experimental cmavo for that in jbovlaste, but I
> may have searched with insufficient diligence). {Voi} itself seems
> utterly useless: has it ever been used correctly and meaningfully?
>
> I don't think it has seen much use at all. I'm sure the irci boys will
> soon find a better use for it since they seem to be re-purposing all
> those wasted one syllable cmavo like "tau", "lau" and such.
I might as well link to http://mw.lojban.org/index.php?title=new_voi
I found this explanation of {voi} practically unintelligible. Between the loose use of logic and linguistic terms ("mid-sentence PREnex"?), and what I can only assume is colloquial Jbopre jargon, I was only able to make any sense of it through the examples. I think that's very unfortunate. It would be nice if it were explained much more clearly, in terms one could, or at least almost could, but in the CLL.In any case, after figuring out the examples, I have a basic idea of it. But I am clearing missing the key point, because I'm not sure how exactly this is different from {poi}?--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.