Re: [lojban] Speaker specificity: {.i da'i na vajni}

[selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>]

la .and. cu cusku di'e
> Assigning /voi/ to {poi'i} -- excellent stuff! I'm delighted to hear
> it's being used already. Rereading today some discussion from 12+ years
> ago, I see {se ka} was also proposed, subject to instigation of a
> convention for coercing added sumti places by addition of SE or FA.
>
> Is there a list of cmavo recycling proposals?

Off the top of my head, here are most of the re-assignments that have 
been considered (and I mean considered, not settled by any means):

ce'u -> ce
ke'a -> ki
tu'a -> tau
jo'u -> jau
du'u -> du
su'o -> sa / su
poi'i -> voi

And there is this proposal to replace good ol' never-used {soi}:

http://mw.lojban.org/index.php?title=new_soi

This proposal is quite popular actually (among those who know about it).

(I also have a secret proposal to assign the currently un-assigned cmavo 
{ja'u} to {na ka'e na} (also known as {bi'ai}).

> I saw somewhere a proposal
> to recycle /du/, which I was initially a little consternated by, since
> {le du} had seemed very useful to me (as meaning unbound "he, she, it,
> they"), but I guess that could be got by {lo co'e}, with {co'e} meriting
> a monosyllabic form.

What I would like even more is a better system of anaphoric pro-sumti 
and pro-bridi in general.

mi'e la selpa'i mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.