Re: [lojban] Re: {da poi} (was: Re: tersmu 0.2

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:

* Sunday, 2014-10-05 at 15:03 -0300 - Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>:

> What value does "ko'a" get in "su'oi tadni poi sruri su'o dinju zi'e goi
> ko'a"? Or for that matter in "su'oi tadni goi ko'a", or in "no tadni goi
> ko'a"? I think that's the value that the noi-clause should be about.

Well... in all cases, I just have ko'a binding to the variable, so that
doesn't help at all!

How about in "ko'a goi su'o tadni cu broda" or "ko'a goi no tadni cu broda"? 

(so I have e.g. {ro broda goi ko'a brode ko'a} ->
{ro da poi broda cu brode da}, and {ro broda goi ko'a du .i ko'a du}
being an error.)

Is it an error because you don't admit unassigned "ko'a" i.e. is "ko'a du" by itself an error? Or is it an error because "ko'a" was at some point bound to a bound variable, and that makes that variable unusable until it is cleared with whatever the cmavo for clearing it was, which I can't remember now?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.