* Thursday, 2014-10-30 at 13:51 +0100 - Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com>:
> On 30/10/2014 02:43, Martin Bays wrote:
> >> SE ba X = xoi ke'a SE balvi X vau
> >> se pi'o X = xoi X se pilno fi ke'a vau
> >> SE ka'a X = xoi fasnu fa ke'a jo'u lo nu X SE klama vau
> >> fau X = xoi fasnu fa ke'a jo'u X vau
> >> (Here {ke'a} stands for the outer bridi.)
> > I don't think it's clear that every tag permits such a definition.
> > e.g. I don't think {no roi} does.
> What's wrong with {broda xoi ke'a rapli li no} → {lo nu broda cu rapli
> li no}?
If {broda xoi ke'a rapli li no} is taken to mean {da fasnu gi'e nu broda
kei gi'e rapli li no}, then we have something of a contradiction
- surely no da ge rapli li no gi fasnu?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature