On 04/11/2014 02:14, Martin Bays wrote:
Agreed. Then, {brode xoi ke'a brodo} is probably better rendered as {da fasnu gi'e nu brodo fa lo su'u brode}. For example, {broda naku} → {da fasnu gi'e nu narfau fa lo nu broda}, and not {da fasnu gi'e nu broda kei gi'e narfau}.* Thursday, 2014-10-30 at 13:51 +0100 - Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com>:On 30/10/2014 02:43, Martin Bays wrote:SE ba X = xoi ke'a SE balvi X vau se pi'o X = xoi X se pilno fi ke'a vau SE ka'a X = xoi fasnu fa ke'a jo'u lo nu X SE klama vau fau X = xoi fasnu fa ke'a jo'u X vau (Here {ke'a} stands for the outer bridi.)I don't think it's clear that every tag permits such a definition. e.g. I don't think {no roi} does.What's wrong with {broda xoi ke'a rapli li no} → {lo nu broda cu rapli li no}?If {broda xoi ke'a rapli li no} is taken to mean {da fasnu gi'e nu broda kei gi'e rapli li no}, then we have something of a contradiction - surely no da ge rapli li no gi fasnu?
pei mu'o mi'e la .ilmen. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.