Re: [lojban] Re: tosmabru test: intelligible explanation sought

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:02 PM, <sunrise2000@comcast.net> wrote:

All three of these "lujvo" pass the tosmabru test as laid out on p. 71.
{cc} is not a valid initial consonant pair, so the test passes and
doesn't demand a tosmabru y-hyphen. 

You're quite right, this is a known erratum in the printed version: http://www.lojban.org/tiki/CLL,+aka+Reference+Grammar,+Errata

You can find the correct version of rule 5a) in http://lojban.github.io/cll/4/11/

At this point, I'm so confused I'm not even sure what the proper form
for a lujvo is.  Does anyone have a formal description (i.e., grammar
rules) for what constitutes a valid lujvo?

The PEG morphology gives formal grammar rules for all word forms: 

 http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+PEG+Morphology+Algorithm

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.