I would be happy to help in quality assurance for a Lojban dictionary improvement project. I don't have in-depth understanding of Lojban yet so it would simultaneously help me learn vocabulary.
I would suggest that:
Sorry if any suggestion is already implemented. I also didn't get to read the full context on this email chain.
My presumption was that the dictionary was intended to be prescriptive, not descriptive as per other dictionaries, but I may be wrong. I'm just trying to get involved in Lojban.
mi'e la.timoteios. From: lojban@googlegroups.com <lojban@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Andrew <summerfallsaway@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, 21 January 2016 7:24 PM To: lojban Subject: Re: [lojban] {cukta} as a case study for why the dictionary needs clearer, more detailed entries la gleki:
-- > ...start your own Lojban dictionary in your own dialect of English... I don't really have a problem with the dialect. I'm saying there's simply not enough information. la stela: > .i nandu fa lo nu valsi smuni galfi .i ku'i frili fa lo nu finti lo cnino I don't think we necessarily need to change the *meaning* of existing words, we just need to revise or rewrite the dictionary entries so that the meaning is clearer. The meaning of the gismu are probably fine, as far as I know. The way we *explain* the meaning needs work. Specifically, I'd like to see an explanation of the meaning and possible usage notes for all the sumti of each brivla. It's not enough to know just the main gloss word for a brivla: One must also understand what would be appropriate and what would be inappropriate to use as the x1 or x2 or x3... of a given brivla. When necessary, there should also be notes about the ways a brivla differs from its English gloss word. For example, I have heard some (I think it might have been la gleki?) suggest that "picture" is an insufficient explanation for the concept of {pixra}, because in English, "picture" connotes a 2D image, while {pixra} could work just as well for 3D objects. la selpa'i: > At least now, compared to two years ago, BPFK has the official backing of LLG to undertake such a thing, so we really only need to ... just do it. What would it take to get this started? Is there anything I could do to help? I think this is important enough to start work as soon as possible -- but it doesn't have to be done all at once. We could just have regular discussions in IRC, or here in the mailing list, about how best to explain the semantics of a single valsi. Or however you think is best. On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 at 11:39:31 AM UTC-8, la stela selckiku wrote: On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:03 AM, selpahi <sel...@gmx.de> wrote: You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |