doi la .greg.
As discussed before, it seems that for now work is absolutely not guided. This makes creation easy, but at the expense of building a strong and unique "core" (~= "official"?) language.
I personally think that there is much to do organizing stuff before you try to address core issues or core improvements. As Gleki wrote, doing stuff on your own will certainly be seen as another "schism", even if you try and pretend doing that for the core language. I bet that going in that direction will end up with "Ok, great job, but we don't want to integrate it because X, Y or Z".
I'm currently trying to think about & prepare proposals to improve organizations. I'll tell you all soon, so that we can debate. Please share your thoughts!
la .sykyndyr.
Le mercredi 8 novembre 2017 07:57:22 UTC+1, Gleki Arxokuna a écrit :
2017-11-07 15:50 GMT+03:00 Gregorio Guidi
<gregori...@posteo.net>:
Trying to be very concrete: let's say I have some hours to dedicate to the project... is there some action that I could do that would increase the chances of reaching a CLL 2.0, or a 4th baseline grammar, or in general to have an updated specification of how "official" Lojban should be understood?
You can join LLG by sending a request in English to
llg-m...@lojban.org In case you get no reply please report.
As for what actually needs to be done to reach CLL 2.0 that depends on what you want. If you fork CLL yourself and update something there others might not like it. If 10 people update it still e.g. 3 people might not like it etc.