Re: [bpfk] Re: {.i} and {ni'o}, continuation or new jufra

[Adam Lopresto <adamlopresto@gmail.com>]

I'd rather not COI, since then we'd need a {do'u} way too often. Unless we want to enable picking up a particular text from before, but that seems unnecessary.

I cannot think of a use case for it not occurring immediately after {fa'ai}, and it's complicated enough as it is, so I'd say yes, unless someone has a good case for why not (and what it would mean somewhere else).

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Daniel Brockman <daniel@brockman.se> wrote:

Adam,

Good initiative.

Would COI work for {di'ai}?

Do we need to require that it occurs immediately after {fa'ai}?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.