Re: [bpfk] Re: {.i} and {ni'o}, continuation or new jufra

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Adam Lopresto <adamlopresto@gmail.com> wrote:
> "conversation" is the new top-level rule in the parser. it gracefully
> degrades to just a single text.
> So given an exchange in IRC
> A: do klama ma
> B: lo zarci
> We can either parse each line completely independently, or we can make our
> logs in a parseable format thus:
> A: fa'ai do klama ma fa'o
> B: fa'ai lo zarci fa'o
>
> That entire block is a single lojban conversation, and can be parsed.

So the conversation generator gets a sequence of "text"s as input and
outputs one "conversation", right? All it does is surround each text
with fa'ai/fa'o (when they are not already present, I suppose) and
then outputs their concatenation. That seems simple enough.

The problem I see is that we must already have the string of texts to
feed the conversationer. You can't feed it the string of phonemes "do
klama ma lo zarci" and expect it to split it into two texts, you must
feed it first chunk "do klama ma", second chunk "lo zarci". In other
words, the hard work will be done somewhere else, not by the
conversationer.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.