Re: [bpfk] BPFK work

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

2010/10/10 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>

On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/10/10 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
>> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > As far as I'm concerned, a conversation /is/ a text.
>> You have said that, yes, but I have shown you examples of
>> conversations, both from lojbab's lessons and fron CLL, that are not
>> texts.
>

> By your definition.

By the parser's definition. Who cares what you or I choose to call a
"text" in an informal way. What matters is that both lojbab's lessons
and CLL both give examples of conversations that do not parse as
single whole entities. The name is irrelevant.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

You're right. They don't parse as single texts. They also exhibit a practice I frown on, and if they didn't follow that practice, they would. So, as far as I'm concerned, your point is moot.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.