Re: [jbovlaste] Type-3 fu'ivla was: newlines

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 7:33 PM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:

Jonathan Jones scripsit:

> Of  course, I'm certain that everyone knows that my feelings on fu'ivla are
> that they should the absolute last resort in all cases, so the above isn't
> likely news to anyone.

Well, I can't agree with you there.  For narrow technical notions, they are just
way more useful.  You can look up what _Mastophora dizzydeani_ is.
How are you going to construct a useful lujvo for that exact species?

I never said they had to be lujvo. I just said that fu'ivla should be a last resort.

Without a lot of effort, and with the consideration that I couldn't find out what "mastophora" means:

{boljivbu jukni la.dizidin.}

That possibly should be {....dizidĩn.}

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

_______________________________________________
jbovlaste mailing list
jbovlaste@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/jbovlaste