[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: questions about 'cu'



Alright, I found it (I think).  CLL C 5, S 13, last sentence:  " Tense, modal, and negation cmavo can appear only at the beginning of the selbri. They cannot be embedded within it. "  That means that we can have our descriptor of selma'o LE, followed by the slot for a PU cmavo (or, technically, NA or modal or other tense cmavo), followed by exactly on selbri, be it a tanru or just a single brivla.  That leads to A) an unambiguous interpretation of "lo ca klama" as "the current goer", and B) of "lo klama ca pinxe" as "the goer is currently drinking",  and C) of "lo ca klama ca pinxe" as "the current goer is currently drinking", since the "ca pinxe" cannot be absorbed as part of the tanru.  Mystery solved.

My reasoning is always potentially wrong, thanks for watching out for me and keeping me straight, Mr. Abbat.  If I'm still wrong or uncited (as good as wrong) somewhere, please feel free to point it out again.  :D

mi'e .tavic. .i mi sipna

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Patrick <sonarman.77@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, so far I haven't managed to find anything which says the way I wrote it is wrong.  "LE PU broda" constructions and "LE broda PU brode" both appear, with the meaning of the "LE PU broda" being equivalent to what I said it would be individually (CLL C 10 12.12), and "LE broda PU brode" giving the meaning I said that fragment would have (CLL, C 6, 2.8), however, I haven't yet found any examples of the two types together (namely, "LE PU broda PU brode") and *why* that's unambiguous.  CLL C 10 *does* say " The placement of a tense construct within a Lojban bridi is easy: right before the selbri. It goes immediately after the ``cu'', and can in fact always replace the ``cu'' (although in very complex sentences the rules for eliding terminators may be changed as a result). "  I feel confident in thinking that what I wrote is both gramatically correct and conveyed the meaning I wanted it to, I'm just looking for how I'm right. Will update again soon.

mi'e .tavic.


On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Patrick <sonarman.77@gmail.com> wrote:
Hmm, I'm not sure.  There might have to still be a "cu" in there, but I'm not positive.  I think maybe you can't nest PU inside of tanru?  I'll get back to you in a few minutes.  My disclaimer before I begin to find out just how wrong I am:  I'm very tired, and it's very late in my time zone.  Write again soon.

mi'e .tavic.


On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Klaus F. Abel <kfa@gmx.net> wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:07:58 -1000
Patrick <sonarman.77@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, I wouldn't say that "ca" (or any of selma'o PU) can replace "cu"
> unambiguously.  Take the following sentence:
>
> lo ca klama ca pinxe
>
> In this case, the first "ca" attaches to the sumti to make it mean
> something like "the one currently going", where the second "ca" attaches to
> the selbri of the entire bridi, for a total meaning of "the one currently
> going is currently drinking", possibly alluding to someone drinking while
> driving or biking.
>

How do you identify "pinxe" as a selbri in this case at all, i.e. what stops one from reading the whole "ca klama ca pinxe" as a tanru (regardless of how it would make sense in translation)? Is this really ambiguous, or just plain wrong (the selbri reading, I mean)?

Klaus

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.