[lojban-beginners] Re: Let's do something like this for Lojban!

[ianek <janek37@gmail.com>]

I'm with aionys here. One can argue, that z3 should be a ka/ni
abstraction and n2 is a number, but
"Semantically, a sumti with “le ni” is a number" CLL 11.5
But I think that putting an exact number (like {li mu}) in z3 wouldn't
mean much.

mu'o mi'e ianek

On 7 Mar, 20:57, Jonathan Jones <eyeo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Felipe Gonçalves Assis <
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> felipeg.as...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> zmadu3 is a dimension, so it should be {lo ka ce'u nanca makau kei}.
> > >> Since this is the last utterance, and it appears to be decipherable,
> > >> you might want to play with the reader and leave it like that. A more
> > >> friendly alternative is to use a tanru like {nanca zmadu}, as in 56.
>
> > > z3 is not a dimension. It is a property or quantity. lo se nanca is a
> > > quantity.
>
> > z4 is a quantity and a {se nanca}. z3 is a quantity that is a function of
> > something. Otherwise, what could be an answer to the following questions?
> >  {la .sam. zmadu la .clalis. li xo}
> >  {la .sam. zmadu la .clalis. lo se nanca be ma}
>
> > mu'o
> > mi'e .asiz.
>
> Seriously, stop arguing things without making sure you're right first.
>
> zmadu <http://vlasisku.lojban.org/vlasisku/zmadu>: x1 exceeds/is more than x
> 2 in property/quantity x3 (ka/ni) by amount/excess x4.
>
> z4 is amount by which x1 is more than x2, z3 is the property/quantity in
> which x1 is more.
>
> --
> mu'o mi'e .aionys.
>
> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.