Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: sedu'u and ko

[Efrain Caro <betsemes@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> Really? Then why do they ALL have place tags in their definition?
>
> du'u abstractor: predication/bridi abstractor; x1 is predication [bridi]
> expressed in sentence x2.

Jonathan, you are obviously a more knowledgeable person on matters of
Lojban than myself; so pardon me whether I'm asking a stupid question.

I want to ask why those definitions contain *[bridi]* in their
definitions. By themselves, I assume they don't. I must assume thus
that the definition refers to a complete abstraction and not the
abstractor by itself. How am I wrong? Does any abstractor form an
abstraction all by itself? If so, what {lo se du'u kei} would mean?
Does it mean {lo se du'u co'e kei}? Or is it illegal?

Please, explain.

mu'o mi'e betsemes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.