[lojban-beginners] Re: coi rodo .i preti lo pamoi sumti i.

[Calpin <calumhalpin@googlemail.com>]

>   You are not crazy, BUT... If Sam were standing right there, and you
> were for example petting him, it would be certainly understood that
> you were referring to him both times.  If he were not there, you would
> be safer saying "la sam cu pendo je gerku" or "la sam cu pendo gi'e
> gerku" or "la sam cu pendo .i sy (or ri) gerku."

I thought if the first sumti was omitted then the bridi was always an
observative. You'd have to say "zo'e gerku" for x1 to be implied by
context. Alternatively you could say "le la sam pendo mi gerku".

Correct me if I'm wrong, I'm a novice too.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.