Re: [lojban] fu'ivla's definition: loanword or morphological class

[Daniel Brockman <daniel@brockman.se>]

>> For the morphological class, I suggest {zi'evla} (once coined by selckiku):
>>
>>     http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/zi'evla
>
> That word has a place for the meaning, whereas we sometimes need to discuss
> meaningless "words" like "adjgadja" and "bongnanba".

We have the same problem with {cmavo}, {gismu}, {lujvo} and {cmevla}.

>> I also think we should add a fifth place to {fu'ivla}, for the source
>> language. Would anyone object to that?
>
> I agree that "fu'ivla" should have places for both the source word and its
> language.

That's good enough for me; I'll add it to jbovlaste.  (It's backwards-compatible
anyway.)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.