[lojban] Re: Named multiples

[Lindar <lindarthebard@yahoo.com>]

> Same as between {lo broca} and {la broca}.

Ah... Makes sense. So la .lindar. is "Lindar." (a meaningless string
of characters) and lo .lindar. is "Thing(s) named Lindar." ? That's
nifty.

> > Can cmevla have multiple places?
>
> I don't see why not?

.spagetis. = x1 is spaghetti with sauce x2
??

> > Is {me} being removed from the grammar due to it not being necessary
> > after this change?
>
> No, definitely not.

Then under what condition would it still be used?

> > Could this possibly be used as a system for creating "slang" words?
>
> Sure, why not?  That's a good thing about cmevla: they're easy to make.

Then I shall coin the first rude Anglo slang, ".kul.".

Well, I'm convinced. It seems like a decent idea as long as it doesn't
get abused. Do we just start using it now, is there some kind of
ceremony we have to have first, or... what now? Does everybody agree
on exactly how it'll work?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.