[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Re: Named multiples
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Lindar wrote:
This argument is really vague. What does "irregular word-form" mean?
What does "normally allowed" mean? Are you saying that this change
would make there be too many pauses?
lojbancanbereadasonebigstringwhichishowit'sheardinspeachsoifwesuddenlyintroducewordsthatCANendinconsonantsthenwefrackuptheabilitytopickoutwordsaccurately.
How about learning the current Lojban morphology before attacking "changes"
that don't actually change it one iota? Lojban can be unambiguously written
without spaces only if stress and all mandatory stops are explicitly marked.
The morphology algorithm breaks words apart and determines what words are of
what type before the grammar has any say in anything. Changing where cmevla
are *grammatical* does not affect the *morphology*. The grammar is only
involved after the phoneme or text stream is broken into words by the
morphology.
If you're saying that this change could result in fu'ivla being
abandoned altogether, why is that a bad thing? Specifically, what is
it about cmevla-as-selbri that makes them good for the speaker but bad
for the language?
The case against long lujvo is moot. We create loanwords from our own
language when they become too long. Also, mitpavycinglepre is a really
stupid example as that isn't an accurate lujvo for 'homosexual', and
I'm quite offended by the idea that we have to have a word like that
in a more enlightened age where gender and sexuality are fluid enough
to warrant "nakni cinse", "fetsi cinse" and so on. I personally am
offended by the use of "mitpavycinglepre".
And I am offended that after we come up with a huge set of words to precisely
cover every part of the Venn diagram of possible human sexuality, you come in
and express offense at the existence of a word for a particular part of that.
That aside, my point is that we create fu'ivla of exceptionally long
lujvo in an effort to keep them short. It's like the lojbanic version
of abbreviating things.
That's really not done much at all (I first heard of it a few months ago), but
it is a somewhat nifty approach.
We have a standard of phonological rules in Lojban. Everything ends in
a vowel, anything with two or more syllables has penultimate stress,
things have to have correct consonant clusters so they don't break
apart. There is an ordered and well-thought-out structure to every
single word, phrase, emphasis, and every other thing in the language.
The ONLY thing that ends in a consonant is a name, and so names become
easy to pick out due to the fact that we rarely use them in
conversation, and they sound nothing like the rest of the language. On
that mental parse tree, if we used "xorla", I would now have to stop
and question every single cmevla to check whether or not it's being
used as a selbri.
Again, this doesn't change the morphology at all. cmevla are defined and
identified exactly as before, they just also are grammatically valid in other
places.
If we restricted cmevla selbri to ONLY being "x1 is named/called...",
then I would agree full-tilt with this proposal. If that doesn't work
with everybody else, then can we at least put -some- restrictions on
them? Perhaps that they're restricted to being single place selbri?
=D We can call my proposal "linla" in honour of xorxes. ((zo'o))
--
Adam Lopresto
http://cec.wustl.edu/~adam/
And entropy continued to increase.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.