Re: [lojban] Re: Named multiples

[Daniel Brockman <daniel@brockman.se>]

> What is the semantic difference between lo .lindar. and la .lindar. ?

Same as between {lo broca} and {la broca}.

> Can cmevla have multiple places?

I don't see why not?

> Is {me} being removed from the grammar due to it not being necessary
> after this change?

No, definitely not.

> Could this possibly be used as a system for creating "slang" words?

Sure, why not?  That's a good thing about cmevla: they're easy to make.

> Could somebody please write a few sample bridi using this new rule?

I'll pass.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.