On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Lindar
<lindarthebard@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I often use "doi pendo", "doi dirba", "doi patfu", etc with no "la" implied.
Hm. Well, maybe it should be the other way, then?
> I think "coi xalbo" could be "coi la xalbo" or "coi lo xalbo"
> depending on context, no need to rule either out. You can always use
> the gadri explicitly if confusion is possible or likely.
I don't like that idea. It seems like that is precisely what Lojban is
trying to avoid. Isn't Lojban supposed to be "completely regular and
without exception"?
Either way, I do not at all like the idea of leaving it up to context.
It needs to be one or the other. Having both be {la} is more
consistent, having selbri imply {le} makes more sense.