[lojban] Re: Named multiples

[Lindar <lindarthebard@yahoo.com>]

> I suggest you focus on the essence of it, and the essence of it is extremely
> simple: We treat cmevla exactly as we treat brivla.  Read that again, slowly:
>
>     We treat cmevla exactly as we treat brivla.
>
> You know how brivla work, right?  What {lo broda} and {la broda} mean?
> Good.  Then you know how cmevla work under xorla (i.e., exactly the same).

=D

It pleases me when people find their Lindar-filters.
((I lol'd @ talking to me like I'm a simpleton. <3 ))

We can't come up with a different name? I'm pretty sure that, aside
from brodV, we're not supposed to have gismu that are the same
excepting the final vowel. xorcme, perhaps? It's more about cmevla
than "la" itself. xorlo, xorcme, what's next?

I have a very valid question for all involved:

Will we be documenting definitions for cmevla now that they are valid
brivla, or should it be left up to context?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.