Re: [lojban] nu pa moi se nunkei la'e lu lo do ckiku ma zvati li'u lu'u

[Alan Post <alanpost@sunflowerriver.org>]

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:04:17AM -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote:
> > Can you possess something in my set,
> > as in the (non-grammatical) ".i do ponse lo mi moi rokci"?
> 
> The grammatical form would be "do ponse lo me mi moi rokci".
> 
> > To make this
> > grammatical do I say ".i do ponse lo mi rokci"?  Or am I saying "you
> > posses the me type-of rock?
> 
> That's also correct, and equivalent to "do ponse lo rokci pe mi". "pe
> mi" attaches to the sumti "lo rokci", "me mi moi" is a tanru unit that
> forms a tanru with "rokci".
> 

I believe I understand this well enough.  In the context of {lo do
ckiku ma zvati}, I believe these are equivalent?:

.i do ponse lo rokci pe mi
.i do ponse lo me mi moi rokci
.i do ponse lo mi rokci

.i mu'o mi'e .alyn.
-- 
.i ko djuno fi le do sevzi

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.