Re: [lojban] {ziltau} vs {taurpau}

["A. PIEKARSKI" <totus@rogers.com>]

> 
> The idea, in fact, was not {tanru be zi'o bei zi'o}, but {se tanru be
> zi'o bei zi'o} (or {te tanru be zi'o bei zi'o} (maybe even with an
> implicit {ka'e}). That is, a tanru-unit is the sort of thing that can
> be a seltau or a tertau, it isn't necessarily a tanru itself,

So it can be a complete part of a tanru i.e. the tanru itself?

 > and it isn't necessarily actually *used* in a tanru.

Where else can it be used?

totus

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.