Idiomatically, yes; literally, more like what I said. And, as I have noted, idioms are anti-logical in the appropriate sense, since there is no mechanical rule to get them back to there logical form.
From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Mon, November 29, 2010 1:10:39 PM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Time for the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:06 AM, John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:
But whether 'iepei' is a legitimate question is not thereby decided; it means "Yes, innit"
No, it means, "Do you agree, and with what intensity do you (dis)agree?"
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.
.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.